Back to Explore

The Prompting Company

GEO Tools

SEO is dead. Be the product cited by ChatGPT.

💡 Traditional search traffic is dropping by 25%. Is your product being cited by ChatGPT yet?

"The SEO Playbook for the AI Revolution"

30-Second Verdict
What is it: SEO for the AI era, helping products get cited by AI like ChatGPT.
Worth attention: Worth watching, but the $1,500/month price is high. Good for enterprise SaaS.
7/10

Hype

7/10

Utility

196

Votes

Product Profile
Full Analysis Report

The Prompting Company: SEO for the AI Era, but with Enterprise Pricing

2026-01-29 | ProductHunt | Official Site


30-Second Quick Judgment

What is it?: It helps your product get cited by AI like ChatGPT, Claude, and Perplexity. Simply put, it's "SEO for the AI era."

Is it worth your attention?: Worth watching, but maybe not worth buying yet. GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) is a real trend, but the $1,500/month price tag locks most people out. If you're an enterprise SaaS, it's worth a chat; if you're an indie developer, try Otterly.AI's $29/month plan first.

How does it compare?: It's like a traditional SEO agency (Ahrefs, SEMrush) mixed with AI visibility tools (Profound AI, Otterly.AI). TPC's edge is its "full-service" approach—they don't just monitor; they write the content and host the pages for you.


Three Key Questions

Is it relevant to me?

Target Audience:

  • B2B SaaS companies (Fintech, DevTools)
  • Growth-stage companies with marketing budgets
  • Products that need to be found when developers ask AI questions

Is this you?: You're a target user if:

  • Your customers are developers or technical staff (who are already using AI search).
  • You rank well on Google but notice your traffic is declining.
  • Your competitors are showing up in ChatGPT answers and you aren't.

Use Cases:

  • Scenario 1: A user asks ChatGPT "What's the best HR software?" and you want to be the answer → Use this.
  • Scenario 2: You want to know how often your product is mentioned by AI → Otterly.AI is cheaper for this.
  • Scenario 3: You're just curious about GEO → This report is enough; no need to buy.

Is it useful?

DimensionBenefitCost
TimeSaves time researching LLM citation mechanismsRequires sales calls and providing product data
MoneyPotentially brings in millions in traffic (per their claims)Starts at $1,500/month
EffortManaged service; no need to change your existing siteRequires trusting a 4-month-old startup

ROI Judgment: If your Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC) is over $500 and your LTV is high, $1,500/month might be a steal. For most indie devs and small teams, monitor your AI visibility with Otterly.AI for $29/month before committing to a full-service agency.

Is it exciting?

The "Wow" Factor:

  • Fresh Concept: The first to turn "getting cited by AI" into a scalable business.
  • Proven Team: Founders have two successful exits (Cotter→Stytch, Typedream→beehiiv).
  • Stunning Data: AI-recommended visitor conversion rates are reportedly 23x higher than traditional search.

The Quote:

"In this new world, you must have an AI-facing website and a human-facing website." — Kevin Chandra, CEO

Real User Feedback:

Positive: Already has big names like Rippling, Rho, and Motion; hosting 500k pages and driving massive traffic. — TechCrunch

Critique: "Launching an AI visibility service while being invisible to AI is like a chef who won't eat their own cooking." — AI SEO Tracker


For Developers

Tech Stack

  • Frontend/Backend: Undisclosed
  • Content Format: Markdown-based, clutter-free pages
  • Core Logic: Analyze user queries → Create AI-friendly content → Route AI crawlers to optimized pages

Core Implementation

TPC follows a three-step process:

  1. Analyze: Identify high-intent questions users ask AI and measure your current citation rate.
  2. Create: Generate Markdown-formatted content specifically designed for LLMs.
  3. Route: Guide AI crawlers (like GPTBot) to these optimized pages.

Key Insight: LLMs love clean, structured Markdown content over human-centric webpages filled with ads and popups.

Open Source Status

  • Open Source?: No public repos on GitHub.
  • Similar Projects: No direct open-source alternatives yet.
  • Build Difficulty: Medium-High. Requires studying crawler behavior and citation preferences across different LLMs. Estimated 2-3 person-months.

Business Model

  • Monetization: B2B SaaS Subscription
  • Pricing: $1,500/month (based on prompt and page volume)
  • Clients: Rippling, Rho, Motion, Vapi, Fondo, Kernel, Traceloop + a Fortune 10 company.

Giant Risk

The risk is real but not immediate. While Google and OpenAI could build these tools, they haven't yet. TPC's moat lies in its first-mover advantage, YC pedigree, and Nvidia partnership.


For Product Managers

Pain Point Analysis

  • The Problem: Users are ditching Google for AI. If AI doesn't mention you, you're invisible.
  • Urgency: High. Gartner predicts a 25% drop in traditional search traffic by 2026, potentially 50% by 2028.

User Persona

  • Primary: B2B SaaS Growth Leads, CMOs
  • Secondary: DevTool companies, Fintech firms
  • Scenario: When a customer asks, "What's a good alternative to [Competitor]?", you need to be in that response.

Feature Breakdown

FeatureTypeDescription
AI Citation MonitoringCoreTracks how often your product is mentioned across LLMs
Query DiscoveryCoreFinds high-intent questions users are asking AI
Content GenerationCoreCreates AI-friendly Markdown pages
AI Crawler RoutingCoreDirects bots like GPTBot to optimized content
Competitor ComparisonNice-to-haveView the AI visibility of your competitors

Competitive Landscape

vsThe Prompting CompanyOtterly.AIProfound AI
Core DifferenceFull Service (Monitor+Content+Host)Monitor + Audit onlyEnterprise Monitoring
Price$1,500/mo$29-$489/mo$99-$399/mo
ProsOne-stop solutionCheap, fast setupMulti-language, Fortune 100 clients
ConsExpensive, very newDoesn't create contentDoesn't host pages

Key Takeaways

  1. Internalize the "AI-facing website" concept—start preparing content specifically for LLMs.
  2. Markdown First—ensure all technical documentation and FAQs are available in Markdown.
  3. Query-Oriented—design content based on what users actually ask AI.

For Tech Bloggers

Founder Story

Three Indonesian founders in their 20s met in their first CS class in the US and have already exited two startups together:

  • Kevin Chandra (28): CEO, technical background.
  • Michelle Marcelline (27): Non-technical, Forbes 30U30 (2022).
  • Albert Purnama (28): Technical Co-founder.

Their first product, Cotter (passwordless SDK), was acquired by Stytch; their second, Typedream (AI site builder), was acquired by beehiiv. TPC has now raised a $6.5M seed round.

Fun fact: "Typedream" came from "Type your dream." Now, they are helping products realize the dream of being "seen" in the AI era.

Discussion Angles

  • Is GEO real or hype? No one truly knows LLM citation algorithms; TPC is essentially "guessing" based on data.
  • Is $1,500/mo worth it? Pocket change for big tech, but a fortune for small teams.
  • Will the giants kill them? Google/OpenAI could enter this space at any moment.

Hype Metrics

  • PH Ranking: 196 votes
  • Media: TechCrunch, Yahoo Finance, Inc, American Bazaar
  • Partnerships: Working with Nvidia on next-gen AI search
  • Investors: Logan Kilpatrick (ex-OpenAI) is an angel investor

Content Suggestions

  • Angles: "Is SEO Dead? Meet GEO," "The Third Act of a 28-Year-Old Serial Entrepreneur."
  • Trend Jacking: AI Agent hype, Google's traffic decline, ChatGPT Search.

For Early Adopters

Pricing Analysis

TierPriceFeaturesIs it enough?
TPC$1,500/moFull Service (Monitor+Content+Host)Only for Enterprises
Otterly.AI Lite$29/mo15 prompt trackingGood for individuals/small teams
Otterly.AI Standard$189/mo100 promptsFor mid-sized companies
Profound AI$99-$399/moBrand monitoringBest for multi-language needs

Advice: Use Otterly.AI's $29/mo plan for a month to check your AI visibility before deciding if you need TPC's full-service treatment.

Getting Started

  • Time to Value: Requires a sales process; no self-service signup.
  • Learning Curve: Low (it's a managed service; TPC does the work).
  • Steps:
    1. Book a Demo on the site.
    2. Provide product info, keywords, and competitors.
    3. TPC analyzes and generates content.
    4. Monitor results and iterate.

Pitfalls & Critiques

  1. Black Box: No one, including TPC, knows exactly how LLMs choose citations.
  2. Price Barrier: $1,500/mo is a non-starter for small teams.
  3. Too New: The company is only 4 months old; long-term efficacy is unproven.
  4. No Free Trial: You can't try it yourself; you must go through sales.

Security & Privacy

  • Data Storage: Your product data is uploaded to TPC.
  • Privacy Policy: Not fully disclosed.
  • Security Audit: As a YC company, they likely meet basic standards.

Alternatives

AlternativeAdvantageDisadvantage
Otterly.AICheap ($29/mo), 14-day free trialMonitoring only; no content creation
DIY MarkdownFreeRequires manual research into LLM preferences
Peec AIReal-time monitoring, EU-friendlyNo page hosting
Traditional SEOMature and affordableNot optimized for AI search

For Investors

Market Analysis

  • Market Size: $886M (2024) → $7.318B (2031)
  • Growth: 34% CAGR, 8x growth in 7 years.
  • Drivers:
    • AI search adoption jumped from 8% to 40% in one year.
    • Gartner predicts a 25% drop in traditional search traffic by 2026.
    • AI-recommended conversion rates are 23x higher than traditional search.

Competitive Landscape

TierPlayersCharacteristics
TopProfound AI, Scrunch AIEnterprise-grade, Fortune 100 clients
MidOtterly.AI, Peec AISMB-focused, price-friendly
NewThe Prompting CompanyFull-service differentiation

Timing Analysis

  • Why Now?: AI search is exploding, but brands are lagging in response.
  • Tech Maturity: LLMs are capable, but citation logic is still a "black box."
  • Market Readiness: Early stage; high cost of market education.

Team Background

  • Founders: Kevin Chandra (28), Michelle Marcelline (27), Albert Purnama (28).
  • Pedigree: YC W20 alumni, returning for S25.
  • Track Record:
    • Cotter → Acquired by Stytch (2021)
    • Typedream → Acquired by beehiiv (2024)
  • Traits: Serial entrepreneurs, young but highly experienced.

Funding Status

  • Raised: $6.5M Seed round.
  • Investors: Base10 Partners, Firedrop (London), Peak XV Partners, Y Combinator.
  • Angel: Logan Kilpatrick (ex-OpenAI).
  • Valuation: Undisclosed.
  • Strategic: Partnership with Nvidia for next-gen AI search.

Conclusion

Final Verdict: GEO is a real trend, but The Prompting Company is currently built for enterprises with budgets. Most users should start with cheaper monitoring tools.

User TypeRecommendation
DeveloperWait — Try DIY Markdown optimization and check llms.txt
Product ManagerLearn — Internalize the "AI-facing website" concept
BloggerWrite — GEO is a fresh topic with high viral potential
Early AdopterTest — Use Otterly.AI at $29/mo first
InvestorWatch — 34% CAGR market with a team that has a proven track record

Resource Links

ResourceLink
Official Sitehttps://promptingcompany.com/
ProductHunthttps://www.producthunt.com/posts/the-prompting-company
Y Combinatorhttps://www.ycombinator.com/companies/the-prompting-company
LinkedInhttps://www.linkedin.com/company/promptingcompany
TechCrunch Reporthttps://techcrunch.com/2025/10/30/the-prompting-company-snags-6-5m-to-help-products-get-mentioned-in-chatgpt-and-other-ai-apps/
Founder Storyhttps://thefounderspack.beehiiv.com/p/michelle-marcelline-living-dream-typedream

Sources


2026-01-30 | Trend-Tracker v7.3

One-line Verdict

GEO is a real trend, but The Prompting Company is currently built for enterprises. Start with cheaper monitoring tools.

FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions about The Prompting Company

SEO for the AI era, helping products get cited by AI like ChatGPT.

The main features of The Prompting Company include: AI Citation Monitoring, Query Discovery.

$1,500/mo (TPC), $29/mo (Otterly.AI Lite).

B2B SaaS, growth-stage companies, products needing AI visibility.

Alternatives to The Prompting Company include: Otterly.AI, Profound AI..

Data source: ProductHuntFeb 2, 2026
Last updated: